"If you want to walk fast then work alone but if you want to walk far then work together." One of the most pressing concern is regarding the given topic: Are intellectual skills enhanced by doing group activities? I completely agree with the statement and shall explore the same from various aspects in the following paragraphs.
The first step is to understand how group activities are improving intellectual skills of a person. Firstly, A person can explore his knowledge by working in a group. He can learn many new things from his colleagues by intersecting with them. Moreover, His communication skills will also be improved when he talks to different people of different regions and religions. Every single person will learn from his another partner; Whether he is the master of the work or a beginner.
Probing ahead, the another main reason for believing that is group activities will enhance the morale of a person. A person will learn to cope up with tough situations ,and will be motivated from his partners to do his best. Furthermore, Person's patience level will also increase which helps him to become relaxed in every situation. The best epitome of this is seen when a person is delivering his views to other members ,and if rest of the members can reject his suggestion then he have to be patient in that situation.
As we have seen that there are number of answers to this question. On balance, However, I tend to believe that team activities offer a guided path to autonomous learning and rational thinking which can impart higher cognitive abilities.
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
- some people believe that movies should be based on social stigmas while other believe that it should be based on real life hero. Discuss both views and give your opinion . 73
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities.to what extend do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l learn to cope up with tough situations ,and will be motivated from his partners ...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is delivering his views to other members ,and if rest of the members can reject hi...
^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...mbers can reject his suggestion then he have to be patient in that situation. As ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave to be patient in that situation. As we have seen that there are number of a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95131086142 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75236308142 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576779026217 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9895451366 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187951270485 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661868305575 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586824186314 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102591718452 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513987714352 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.