Some people think that planning for future is a waste of time. They believe it is more important to focus on the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While some people advocated the idea of making plans for the time ahead, many others believed there is no point in worrying for the future and we should only live in the present. Personally, I strongly disagreed with this statement.
On the one hand, it is advantageous for one to set a clear goal. First and foremost, It is keeping people ambiguous and motivated through their career paths and daily lives. It seems to be shreds of evidence that people with good preparation will strive for work to achieve their goals and objectives. This is shown by many people fall into disorientation due to their lack of future-preparing. Furthermore, people with master plans for the time to come are more likely to solve the upcoming lifetime traumas properly. The financial crisis is a good case in point. Last but not least, there is no entrepreneur or enterprise run well without a circumspect and elaborate scheme. Good planning helps people to minimize the uncertainties and its damage
Nevertheless, living-for-the-moment is becoming an ideology lifestyle for many people these days. They believed that destiny cannot be changed and making plans tantamount to giving ourselves unnecessarily concerns. Hence, living in the present is the means of keeping themselves comfortable and contented. I found these arguments flawed. First of all, making future plans is far from synonymous with excessive worrying. On the contrary, a good planner may cope better in difficult times and, as a result, avoid additional troubles. Moreover, planning can save us from the worst scenarios that could play out. Insurance is an absolute example. Many people have a living-in-present lifestyle do not purchase their insurance. Consequently, it cost them a fortune when grave thing happen
To sum up, planning for the future keeping people strive for their aims, solving the coming sufferings more accurately and minimize the uncertainties. Therefore, it is flawed for people to live without planning or in other words to live-in-present
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-20 | Hoang Minh | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-05 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Overpopulation. Problems and Solutions 11
- The movement of people from the countryside into the cities is happening in many parts of the world resulting in the problems especially in cities What are the causes of this movement and how can it be reversed 87
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Children spend too much time watching TV nowadays. What are problems and solutions? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worrying about'?
Suggestion: worrying about
...ny others believed there is no point in worrying for the future and we should only live in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne when grave thing happen To sum up, planning for the future keeping people s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27244582043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11200494195 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603715170279 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7177428821 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.15 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287838750062 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753394931392 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668411111006 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198996683124 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041732554396 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.