Some people think that politicians should be responsible for solving environmental problems, as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common notion that environmental protection should be done by politicians, as individuals can not contribute to it too much. I find this argument totally groundless because the roles of these two are incomparable.
There are several reasons why the government should take the responsibility for the environment. To begin with, it is highly understandable that only politicians who have enough resources such as finance, labor, technology can solve environmental issues happening on a large scale. For instance, when it comes to universal problems like global warming or water pollution, it will require a large amount of money for investing modern devices, a team of professional scientists to solve it, which could not be afforded by any single individual. Moreover, such environmental protection projects could only be organized by the power from these authorities. For example, when they want to propagandize the importance of protecting the environment to the public, they will be able to include a large number of people in participating such campaigns on mass media and even imposing environmental laws on production activities.
In addition, it is still reasonable why individuals could also make a significant contribution to environmental protection. Firstly, it is highly possible that each person could change the whole face of the world just by changing their own daily habits. For instance, instead of driving a motorbike or a car on their way to school or office, they can walk, cycle or use public transport to reduce the emissions into the air and address air pollution. Secondly, individuals can also conduct their activities to nurture the environment. To be specific, just by planting trees, they will increase green coverage on Earth, thereby enriching the habitat of many living creatures as well as producing more oxygen.
In conclusion, from my perspective, it is unreasonable to compare the role of politicians and citizens as they have distinctive roles in protecting the environment. Both the government and individuals are vital to the conservation of our environment, therefore their mutual cooperation will help the environment to be more well-preserved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Trịnh Ngọc Trâm | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 787, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he public, they will be able to include a large number of people in participating such campaigns ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4110787172 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30074995014 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583090379009 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.098901368 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219182262751 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775993271657 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562439548592 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129621171702 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419535038509 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.