Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that public transport service should be solely subsidized by governmental budget. While this practice would be applied in certain cases, I believe that both the government and inhabitants should invest in the system.
That the public transport system is entitled to financial support by the authority may not be an ultimate practice. Firstly, although the nation’s inhabitants could experience the service for free, the fiscal budget may not guarantee sufficient capitals for maintaining the system operation, particularly the budget for maintenance and sanitation. Furthermore, beside the public transport service, there are other fields that need financial investment from the authority to wholly ameliorate the residents’ living standard such as transport infrastructure and medical service. Therefore, the complete subsidy for the public transport service may not only put the government under unnecessary financial pressure, especially in developing countries, but also require a higher tax payment from the residents.
As opposed to the governmental funding completely for public transport, residents should be charged a small fare. In most countries, such as Korea, this practice would still encourage inhabitants to make use of the service, and the revenue would be generated for labor cost and other minor services. Furthermore, as the public transport operation is of prime necessity to a country, inhabitants should responsibly contribute to its development. Otherwise, the public transport system can be funded by the government, especially in developed nations, if the country has enough budget to invest in not only the public transport but other aspects as well.
In conclusion, I think that the public transport service should not only funded by the government but the residents as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-03 | Kshee | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | Jaspreet_kaur_ | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 93
- Topic Some people claim that tourism can help to bridge cultural gaps between people of different nationalities and cultures Do you agree or disagree 94
- The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018 Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnment, especially in developed nations, if the country has enough budget to inve...
^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'should' requires base form of the verb: 'fund'
Suggestion: fund
...ublic transport service should not only funded by the government but the residents as ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68864468864 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04623630226 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8031364946 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251844469154 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122591021434 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662281114128 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191006683599 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501352693766 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.