It has been proven that public transport is being common in our life and some people think that public transport should be fully paid by the authorities for the residents. Personally, I disagree with this statement because it may give another result and I believe that reducing the price can be a more effective way.
To begin with, there are two benefits of making public transport free. The first advantage is using more public transport instead of private cars or motorbikes as a method to deal with environmental problems. For example, with the no-cost, people will reconsider and likely prefer using public transport, and that will lead to decreasing air pollution. Besides, it helps poor people who can't afford to buy a ticket to travel easier. Many people have to walk to their destinations although they are very far because of moneyless so the free tickets are beneficial for them.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that free public transport can't be a long-lasting solution and it can lead to another drawback while reducing the price will solve the problem in a better way. It will put lots of stress on the government to pay all the fees, and as a result, the investments in other essential elements like healthcare, economics, and education could be cut down. By mitigating the price of public transport, the stress put on the government will be eased and the residents can easily use the service of public transport without paying a lot of money .
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that public transport doesn't have to be fully funded by the government. In fact, reducing the price is a solution for the authorities and citizens.
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tion. Besides, it helps poor people who cant afford to buy a ticket to travel easier...
^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e, I believe that free public transport cant be a long-lasting solution and it can l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... transport without paying a lot of money . In conclusion, for the reasons I have...
^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... strongly believe that public transport doesnt have to be fully funded by the governme...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92068965517 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71279670286 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4175076375 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393020885796 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136367086947 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775742966327 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230235029596 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101033614213 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.