Some people believe that public transport should be free for the people who use it. The idea sounds plausible but I find it hardly practical to make the public transport completely free for the citizens.
Public transportation benefits the city in many different ways. First of all, it helps reduce air pollution. Less fuel burned means better air quality for cities that have a lot of vehicles. People stop using their private vehicles which means there will be no harmful smoke released. Second, public transportation improves road congestion. The more people using public transport to commute, the less vehicles on the road to cause traffic jams. Third, the government can decrease the cost of maintaining the roads, bridges as the commuters change their way to travel from private transport to public transport.
However, the idea of free public transport is not as reasonable as people think. Firstly, it takes an extreme burden on the local budget. Therefore, investments in other fields such as healthcare, education, entertainment improvements can be limited. Secondly, we still do not know how effective public transport is for the environment, traffic and community. Because all of the benefits we have listed lately are not shown in reality, they are still very theoretical. People still choose to commute with their private transport based on some understandable reasons. Not only the government but also the residents should fund public transportation.
In conclusion, free public transportation sounds plausible for the people that want to use it but not for all. I still find it unsuitable because of some of the facts that I have listed.
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...lic transportation benefits the city in many different ways. First of all, it helps reduce air...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... using public transport to commute, the less vehicles on the road to cause traffic j...
^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ronment, traffic and community. Because all of the benefits we have listed lately are not ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
.... I still find it unsuitable because of some of the facts that I have listed.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23684210526 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88346844946 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8663587614 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3888888889 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7777777778 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3650889444 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116863837389 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110843139115 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244745463599 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688761930417 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.