Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether academic abilities is an imperative criterion for choosing students in schools in lieu of the different one. Although this stance is formidably censured, I am at loggerheads owing to some rational reasons.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that students with distinct abilities have a tendency to work collaboratively and learn from others. To be more specific, when an individual possesses a different capability, it literally signifies that he has an original mindset compared to the remainder of his classmates. Each student can, for instance, come up with their own solution for a certain exercise and, perceptibly, they can pick up various solutions from other students in this class through learning together.
On the other hand, I express my strong feeling that academic abilities can bring legion merits for teachers as well as students. To begin with, teachers can thrive in streaming their students by the same method. That can be explained by the fact that people selected to a class with their academic abilities seem to be on the same studying level. Therefore, teachers are able to save time efficiently in lecturing and no longer feel stressed about devising a variety of teaching methods for each type of student. Moreover, the sense of pessimism among students is surely eradicated, instead, students are capable of getting involved in a healthy study competition. Evidently, a person in class that follows the same academic level can avoid the feeling of peer pressure, hence they have the same qualification. As a result, they can keep up with an antistress and nonaggressive playground for studying.
In conclusion, notwithstanding a handful of benefits that a class with different abilities students cause, I do ascertain that opting for those who own academic abilities is a wise decision for school.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- Task 1 The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- In some countries there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 73
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25167785235 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98121266193 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2621944394 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299305804309 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111097723063 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739213880137 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195944380992 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223271597289 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25167785235 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98121266193 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2621944394 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299305804309 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111097723063 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739213880137 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195944380992 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223271597289 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.