some people think that schools should teach students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to hove students with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is an issue of debate that whether the education provided in school should be based on the academic capability that student have or it is a better approach to make student with various abilities to study together. This essay will highlight both the view in ensuring paragraph with examples.
Ambiance plays the vital role for achieving the desired goals. The ideology of making intelligent and dull student separate makes the environment competitive. For instance, if the classroom only contains group of intelligent students then all of them would work hard and try to achieve the best they can. Furthermore, they also stay away from distraction which is caused by many of the weak students. There was survey done in Harvard University by the department of psychology regarding the effect of atmosphere on individuals. They allocated three enormous halls to students. One hall contained photos of food items, Second hall contained images of different sleeping postures and third contained the pictures of inspirational quotes. All of them were given books to study. Finally after taking their exam the result was astonishing. People of third room scored more then the total for first and second room.
However, all the members are born with same caliber, the usage of potential may vary. If the students are made to study together weak student try to target them and get motivation to study and upsurge their performance as well as grades. If any of the weak student are facing problems they can ask for help easily. While this facility was not available before.
To conclude, in my opinion, separating student with different capabilities not only affect students mindset but also make them pessimistic.This generates inferiority complex in them. Hence, working together and growing together many be the ideal way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | shiv_mark42 | 76 | view |
- More and more people ore using the internet to do their tasks rather then doing in person. (e.g. bonking, shopping, hotel booking etc. ). Do the advantages of this trend outweighs the disadvantages? 56
- compare two tables 46
- More and more people ore using the internet to do their tasks rather then doing in person. (e.g. bonking, shopping, hotel booking etc. ). Do the advantages of this trend outweighs the disadvantages? 56
- Line graph 84
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...academic capability that student have or it is a better approach to make student ...
^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... All of them were given books to study. Finally after taking their exam the result was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 869, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...shing. People of third room scored more then the total for first and second room. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... problems they can ask for help easily. While this facility was not available before....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... mindset but also make them pessimistic.This generates inferiority complex in them. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, third, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19661016949 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7201863836 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633898305085 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9827439359 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223333406239 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548891481315 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720312422249 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154321396943 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860970563008 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.