SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT SECONDARY OR HIGH-LEVEL STUDENT SHOULD BE TAUGHT HOW TO USE MONEY MANAGEMENT AS IT IS AN IMPORTANT LIFE SKILLS, DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
In today’s burgeoning population, everyone is lucrative in their own specialized field. Hence money management is the imperative life skill which should be taught to student in their early age. However, I completely agree with this notion and support my point of view in following paragraph.
Firstly, money management is pivotal point of anyone’s life. In this contemporary world, teenagers are been lured by the booming advertisement of electronics, branded clothes and even other accessories which makes them spendthrifts. For instance, some teenagers tend to buy the advanced version of their phone, even if the current phone satisfies all the needs. The reason behind this due to peer-influence.
Secondly. If the courses like management of money is taught early, then that is beneficial to themselves. The reason for this is from very young age they would be able to understand the value of money, which is a very good virtue. Apart from this, they will also be able to know how to save for future needs. One should understand that coming future is today’s present and one should be prepared to live with that in a safe and secure way.
Lastly, they will also learn to control the unnecessary need of shopping or buying any electric device. This all ways would be beneficial to them, once they start earning and take responsibility of their family, when they reach their adolescence. This trait would lead them to a financially-balanced life.
To sum up, I would like to reiterate saying that the best teacher to teach money management is parents, because they have gone through that path. Irrefutably it saves their future so it is a wise option to teach money management in high school.
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- A large amount of advertisements nowadays are now targeted at children Many people say this has negative effects on children and should therefore be banned to what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The chart below shows the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrient, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 61
- he table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002.Summarize information and make comparison which relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998,2000,2002 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...crative in their own specialized field. Hence money management is the imperative life...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 110, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
...ing or buying any electric device. This all ways would be beneficial to them, once they ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12367491166 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94098241536 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2546989161 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173487695802 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060839783337 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064616217961 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973147762454 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477079094243 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.