Every parent wants to raise her/his child in an acceptable way. Encouraging children for being a beneficial person in society is becoming a major issue among families. Co-operation and competition among offspring should be constructive, and amplifying one them rather than another may have destructive consequences.
At first, sense of co-operation not only among children is extremely vital but among adulthoods should have a powerful currency. Furthermore, our children are building their future horizons and they should learn collaboration for gaining prosperity. By encouraging them for co-operation they would reinforce themselves in terms of practicing group works, mutual respect, flexibility to criticism, patience, not to be selfish, and to be social. Therefore, they would increase their self-confidence and self-esteem and it would help them to have self-rounded personality and of course collaboration can be dramatically helpful for spoiling children. Improving these characteristics in our children merely depends on our proper and appropriate ways of education. Family members, parents and tutors should be educated for raising sense of co-operation and should develop constructive and positive competition beside co-operation among children.
Sometimes, creating a before programming competition among young students can be much useful than a destructive co-operation. Children should be aware of how constructive competition may have powerful effects on society and industry in future. Constructive revival make them more strong and help them to be creative in solving their problems.
All in all, revival and collaboration are very vital factors for our future generations and not only parents and tutors should be aware of them but also governments should necessarily dedicate budgets and private firms for educating both adults and students.
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 87
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an acceptable way" with adverb for "acceptable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ery parent wants to raise her/his child in an acceptable way. Encouraging children for being a benef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...owerful effects on society and industry in future. Constructive revival make them more st...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91881918819 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26824799693 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7634029289 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278238568234 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108386834417 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574523770311 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170807513229 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471923614576 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.