Many individuals are of the opinion that oral communication is more effective than written communication. From my perspective, both spoken and written forms are important in equal measure, and therefore, I completely disagree with the statement.
Spoken language, on the one hand, facilitates our daily communication. Almost all social activities that human beings engage in, such as making purchases, exchanging information, and chatting with friends, require people to utter words to one another. Hence, it is not an overstatement to say that a lack of oral communication renders us unable to carry out essential tasks in our lives. Additionally, speaking can enable us to emotionally connect with listeners. For instance, the tone of one’s voice can convey a wide range of emotional messages, which is why some people can inspire and influence others simply through powerful speech as an effective tool of persuasion and expression.
Written communication, on the other hand, also has advantages that make it a superior choice over oral language in some situations. In the workplace, written messages, emails or documents are effective tools. While speech may be ignored and misunderstood, written forms are usually stated clearly. Thus, employees can reread documents repeatedly to steer clear of miscommunication. From a legal perspective, written forms are also required in legal procedures. Most contracts are carefully drawn up in written form and entail signatures, and therefore they are valid and hard to violate. In contrast, almost ‘agreements’ and ‘promises’ in oral forms are, in most cases, invalid.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that both spoken and written communication are equally important in our society. Whereas, spoken language can enable us to do daily tasks and effectively express our emotions, written language is useful in the workplace and plays an integral role in legal matters.
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 82
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57288135593 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20880360396 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8676542996 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205146911995 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06259441911 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595824545028 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136964407307 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616838562126 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57288135593 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20880360396 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8676542996 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205146911995 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06259441911 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595824545028 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136964407307 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616838562126 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.