Many individuals are of the opinion that teachers have a greater influence on the development of children’s intellectual and social capacities, compared to parents. However, from my point of view, despite the specific impacts of instructors on kids, I believe that it is the parents who play a bigger role.
Admittedly, teachers affect the growth of their students in terms of intelligence and interactive abilities. In fact, students, especially little youngsters, are profoundly sensitive to the behaviour of individuals around them. Therefore, when students are sent to school where they spend the majority of their time with their teachers, their development can be effortlessly affected by those instructing them. For instance, by attending group work assignments or creative activities organized by their teachers, not only can students hone their interpersonal skills, such as collaboration or communication, but they can also enhance their various kinds of intelligence, like problem-solving or logical thinking.
Nevertheless, the effect of parents on their children is much more significant than that of educators. The first reason is that parents are the ones whom children spend more time with, as opposed to teachers only teaching them for a couple of years. In other words, teachers, barely having any responsibility for the students having graduated and left school, can hardly have a great impact on these youngsters as parents who are often by their side until they reach adulthood. Furthermore, unlike teachers who are in charge of looking after numerous students simultaneously, parents only have one or a few children to nurture. While many parents can spend hours talking or solving puzzles with their children, which facilitates the betterment of these children’s communication and critical thinking skills, it is hardly possible for teachers to do it with each of their students.
In conclusion, despite the undeniable impact of teachers, what can define how intelligent and good at social skills a child can be is his or her parents. However, both of them need to join hands for the sake of the comprehensive growth of children
.
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 92
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor bike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of the comprehensive growth of children .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43916913947 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13374507271 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563798219585 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5338897072 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433645010738 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148347414564 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896608902557 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220409819003 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107580157163 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of the comprehensive growth of children .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43916913947 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13374507271 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563798219585 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5338897072 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433645010738 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148347414564 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896608902557 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220409819003 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107580157163 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.