Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some people are of the opinion that students should learn about the food's nutrition and the food preparation. However, some others are opposed to this idea, claiming that students should focus on crucial subjects at school. In my opinion, students should study about food alongside other academic subjects.
On the one hand, opponents of the food preparation course argue that such courses are a huge waste of time, because the science of food does not contribute to academic qualifications or decent scores that students need in order to get into top universities like other subjects such as Math and English. Moreover, no employers want to know about their cooking skills, except those students want to work as a chef. In that case, they can learn about it at some vocational colleges.
On the other hand, my firm belief is that it is beneficial for students to do the course in food. Firstly, they are able to know which kinds of food are healthy for them since learning about food can broaden their knowledge about the nutritional values that the food contains such as fat, calories, protein, etc. As a result, they cut down on the amount of unhealthy food that they consume like sugary drinks and fast food, which are known as contributing factors to obesity among teenagers. Also, they may add more nutritious food to their diets such as vegetables, fruits and whole grain. Furthermore, parents are not too concerned about preparing food for their children when they are up to their ears in work as their children are already taught how to cook meals themselves.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that the food related subjects should be put into the school curriculums so that students can lead a healthy lifestyle and not depend on their parents when it comes to cooking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where releva 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 67
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The advantages and disavantages of online learning 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...on that students should learn about the foods nutrition and the food preparation. How...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91118421053 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52417115315 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8484319806 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265544703377 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118792975518 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920847559809 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191320553451 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111887554467 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.