Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Some people think that should bailiwick the science of food and how to compose it. Others think that school time should be used in find out consequential issue. I discuss both view
I think views of mixed opinions above from student’s parents because some people want their children have learning about cooking and how to cook. But, other don’t think so because their just want students learning important subjects same as Maths, Chemistry and English to make it easier later when applying for jobs or doing calculations.
I will talk about the first view reason why many people want students to learning food science l. For many family they want their children just learning about cooking because they think that it necessary to make it easier later. When their children have a family. Now, there are quite a few families who still keep the custom of female just learning about cooking to make it to take care of their families only, without having to learn too complicated things. So this problem occurs for some children live in a family having such a custom will often lead to this problem. Or maybe they think that’s more than enough.
With second view, they think students should learning important subjects. I agree with opinion above. Because in modern life, many companies and universities give more requests to the students including: Grades in subjects such as Maths or English are valued internationally. Therefore, many schools now are promoting the above subjects. Example, students who are good at English, Maths and Chemistry are also respected and get points for the college entrance exam.
In my opinion, I agree with second views. However, in the future all the students cant learning subjects that they like and I hope will not such problem happen again
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- The chart below give information about how many Europe citizens of various age groups who frequently go to the gym from 1990 to 2010 67
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
- The bar chart show the number of visit to community website in first year and second years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features have relevant 67
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun family seems to be countable; consider using: 'many families'.
Suggestion: many families
...tudents to learning food science l. For many family they want their children just learning ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t it necessary to make it easier later. When their children have a family. Now, ther...
^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...However, in the future all the students cant learning subjects that they like and I ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01879699248 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39438271245 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548872180451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2457137603 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231416551591 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769746187421 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080441991633 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134374678669 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673728054758 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.