Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways.
What is your opinion?
It is considered by some that success the most effective way to determine intelligence, while others argue that intelligence can be judged through other ways. In my opinion, I agree that success can be regarded as a way to calculate intellect. However, I also believe that it is not solely the best way to measure cleverness.
Firstly, success is very important in life. It is believed that only intelligent people succeed in life. People with high intellect can easily grasp anything and hence acquire vast knowledge on different topics. They use their skills wisely and they have control over their lives. They work hard to innovate and do their job with the utmost dedication. They can be a motivation for everyone and can transform lives for other people. For instance, Bill Gates, the owner of Microsoft Corporation, is a world popular figure who motivates people. He succeeded through his intelligence and hence he can be considered as an example to show that success can be a measure of intelligence.
But, only success can't be considered as a measure of intelligence. Everyone is not the same and they can be intelligent in their own way. In fact, success can't be defined and it depends on one's perspective of life. There is a chance that people might not be intelligent but cannot be successful. This depends upon various factors. Other measures like Creativity can be used for intelligence. Furthermore, there are many persons who achieve success without being intelligent because of their will power and perseverance.
In conclusion, success can be supposed as a way to calculate intellect but it should not be used entirely to measure intelligence.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-14 | thomasneverseen | 56 | view |
2023-07-14 | thomasneverseen | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.What is your opinion? 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010. 78
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours. What causes this situations? How to solve it 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o their job with the utmost dedication. They can be a motivation for everyone and ca...
^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e of intelligence. But, only success cant be considered as a measure of intellige...
^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...gent in their own way. In fact, success cant be defined and it depends on ones persp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... used entirely to measure intelligence.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03985507246 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94391137039 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525362318841 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1621583873 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2105263158 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5263157895 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400550629178 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12862333601 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957238788938 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270167359574 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736301381433 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.