Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination. Other think money and appearance are more important.
Disscuss both sides and give your opinion.
The behavior of perseverance, absolutely, is an imperative factor of thriving a person quality. Folk argue that hardwork and strength of will are the prime of integral parts of success. Hence other believe contrary that wealthness and styles are more vitally important. In this essay, according to this motion, I intend to elaborate both the points of view and offer of my personal argument.
However, unsuccessful people, surely, come from the failure of youth age. There are some reasons of this, first and foremost, less of effort to do something, nevertheless prestige person can be reached their goal. Often from highly hard work and determination that lead to work effectively and efficiently. For illustrate, presently, people can be seen high-class famous people from a deal of aspects – politics, mathematics, economics and etc. From extremely strength of will. Jokowi, the number one person in Indonesia, is president who has perseverance from his life till be become the success one, hence people can heard the story of hardwork often with regard to the obstacles and sometime the gulf of failure.
However, money and style are, considerably, pivotal things to reach goal and prosperity of person. On my personal rank, comprehensively, I argue that richness may bring people to easy create job opportunity. For example, people who affluent, absolutely, generate a company that full its virtues. In addition, it is undeniable fact, sometime people with nice looking become highly rich, this is imply, they easy to get money with they body as well as model doing.
To sum up, there are numerous factors that people could become rich. With highly intesify of hard work and determination people can become success, and on the other side, money and styles also possible to enrcich quality of people life.
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 74
- 08/11/2017Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 56
- The population in most cities is growing as people move to cities to find work and new opportunities What problem does overpopulation in the cities cause How can these problems be solved 25
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...the prime of integral parts of success. Hence other believe contrary that wealthness ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ects – politics, mathematics, economics and etc. From extremely strength of will. Jokowi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a affluent'.
Suggestion: who is a affluent
...te job opportunity. For example, people who affluent, absolutely, generate a company that fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'implied'.
Suggestion: implied
...ice looking become highly rich, this is imply, they easy to get money with they body ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20408163265 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78039952171 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605442176871 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3403567266 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213933038131 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660085651164 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592163152734 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129794175991 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599576115866 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.