According to some fraction of society, it is enunciated that, higher education should be focused on future career, while others have contradictory view point and elaborated in, main purpose of education not should be provide labor force for industries .
Although, I am of the opinion that, the potential benefits of the former view simply overwhelm the positive consequences of latter.
As the opinion of former fraction, there is a deluge of reasons in favor of their stance. The most preponderant one can be simply elaborated in this manner, factual evidence of enhancements of success of an individual could be witnessed with the guarantee of expert knowledge in certain areas with practical knowledge. Identically these positive factors have visible and mostly invisible aid augment in human lives in increasingly incredible ways. Undoubtedly, which has a huge potential to lead to positive consequences.
Moreover as it is claimed, professional and practical knowledge, would catalyst the individual to rise above their genes, irrespective disadvantage families, crushing circumstance and initially limited capabilities to transform their own lives in constructive ways. As most compelling evidence, these aspects influence the individual to become a person with sense of purposes are driven, focused, committed and lit up from the inside to gain financial, social and economic prospect.
Whereas latter fraction strongly deny any claim of positivity of making market oriented workforce, while praising the value of provide graduates focused on society and individual development.
And it is well evident fact that, moral behavior and ethical patterns pave the way to minimize about the gaps, biases, limitations, and prejudices to be a better success person of the sensible mind with an openness to see and understand the way to develop their individual lives.
To sum up, hence it is apparent that, why many are favor of this trend, in my view of argument outlined above and I can conclude that, positive factors of this move cannot be ignore red.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: dr.faisal
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provided'?
Suggestion: provided
...main purpose of education not should be provide labor force for industries . Although,...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ld be provide labor force for industries . Although, I am of the opinion that, th...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...tial to lead to positive consequences. Moreover as it is claimed, professional and prac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their genes, irrespective disadvantage families, crushing circumstance and init...
^^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctive ways. As most compelling evidence, these aspects influence the individual t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42679127726 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97753376833 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1430192638 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.363636364 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109399788519 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346382217186 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446364084868 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470390566125 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040048575769 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.