Universities are normally seen as the place where the next generation can increase knowledge to improve employment. An increasing number of students regard fundamental theories and elementary courses useless, they suggest university should give more practical training instead of providing theoretical lessons. In my view, theoretical knowledge is important as it would be beneficial to young generation’s growth and future career.
By learning theories at university, people can gain a full understanding of concepts and principles of different subjects, so they can be skillful at their professions. Many theories have developed from the practices of predecessors, so this theories knowledge has practical implications. Thus students who are familiar with this kind of knowledge would successfully deal with practical problems at work.
Academic and theoretical study can also improve the problem-solving abilities of learners. University students need to collect information on different subjects to finish essays and reports, so they can gain experience in analyzing different unfamiliar information and solving the problems. When they enter the workplace, they would show confidence in doing research when problems arise, and come up with corresponding solutions. In contrast, those people who did not go to university may receive some practical training to deal with some normal tasks, but they may be helpless in the face of unusual problems.
Meanwhile, we should never ignore the significance of practical training for youth. There is no doubt that through the process of practical training, students would gain more hands-on experience which cannot be taught at classroom. For instance, young doctors have to work in hospitals for several years to complete a training program. In this period of time, they would gain a wealth of medical experience which cannot be learnt at university.
In conclusion, theoretical knowledge is of great importance as it would be beneficial to students’ growth and future career, as well as the practical training is necessary for youth.
- Employers should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nowledge is important on the ground that it would be beneficial to young generati...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and principles of different subjects, which can assist them in being skillful ...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...l knowledge has practical implications. Thus students being familiar with this kind ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ufficient to respond unexpected problems Meanwhile, we should never ignore the si...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'experience'.
Suggestion: rarely experience
...ry, students would acquire more hand-on experience rarely to be taught at class. For instance, yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...to complete a training program. In this period of time, they would gain a wealth of medical ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in contrast, kind of, no doubt, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87533875339 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18231040858 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8432542661 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.533333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274559041216 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879251041766 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057909440462 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148758862441 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431311784894 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.