Some people think that using animals for experimentation is cruel. Whereas other people think that it is necessary for the development of science. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The scientists have been experimenting their new inventions on the animals for the centuries. People are divided on this topic of experimentations. Some opine that such practices give severe pain to the animals while others find this as essential for scientific development. This essay intense to discuss both perspectives. I, however, agree latter view.
On the one hand, people are opposing the method of animal testing due to some valid reasons. firstly, the dumb animals go through intolerable physical as well as mental stress when they are put in observations by the researcher. Secondly, the animals die out due to hunger under they are put. Thirdly, some inputs of testing might not be absorbed by their bodies, as a result, a large numbers of poor animals have got a permanent disability. The experiments on the rats, for example, often result in a loss of their lives, as per numbers of the scientific journals. Therefore, the animal followers from all around the world have been demanding a ban on such cruel practices.
On the other hand, it is irrefutable that scientists could drive valuable outcomes through animal experiments specifically in the field of medicine. Today, the world has been suffering from a number of chronic diseases: HIV aids, cancer, and so on, which have caused a large number of casualties. Also, human rights prevent the researchers to practice on mankind. What is more, the experimentations on the animals have brought fruitful results for the humans. The vaccine of polio, for instance, was manufactured only after its successful usage on the rabbits, and today, that drug has made the world polio-free. Therefore, it seems like these are the only ways to fight against the current diseases.
Weather to do medical testing on the animals or not is becoming a debatable topic. There are those who consider it as a humiliation, and other sees it as a medical advancement. In conclusion, I believe that as such practices are inevitable, but scientists should choose such species which do not have the mind so they would not fill any pain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | bhargav5508 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that using animals for experimentation is cruel. Whereas other people think that it is necessary for the development of science. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Some people think that economic progress is the only way to measure a country s success while other think that there are other factors which can be used to measure a country s success What are the factors and among them which one is more important than ot 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...imal testing due to some valid reasons. firstly, the dumb animals go through intolerabl...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s, cancer, and so on, which have caused a large number of casualties. Also, human rights prevent ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06376811594 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.889237211 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1524573258 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.35 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197694259544 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577790833852 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471489140772 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119780067472 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755440974143 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.