Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos xan be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give you own opinion
In this day and age, a host of wild animals is on the brink of extinction so how to conserve them is always one of the topics of interest. It is argued that keeping animals in zoos is unacceptable and immoral so it is imperative to close down all these places while other say that zoos can play an integral part in preserving animals. In spite of some severe consequences zoos can bring to animals, I believe that they are prime factors for their protection.
On the one hand, living inside cages for years can make a negative impact on their health and essential instincts that they have gained when living in forests. In fact, there is an inseparable correlation between animals and natural habitats so forcing them to say inside cages can deter them from being exposed to the environment, which can lead to losing surviving aptitude. Therefore, it is drastically challenging for them to turn back to the normal life in forests when they are released. Furthermore, it is recorded that there is a myriad of zoos mistreating animals. By means of social media, it is not too difficult for us to find dozens of videos and images of skinny ones which are punched at the faces or famished by ruthless zookeepers. These animals are woefully abused to appeal visitors as much as possible, which contribute to a huge amount of profit for the owners. More specifically, when they are old or sick, they are instantly taken to slaughterhouses where they are killed for their meat, fur and other valuable parts of their bodies.
On the other hand, erecting zoos is considered as an ideal way to protect animals owing to these following reasons. First of all, the illegal poaching and trade are happening more and more often so zoos are the places which can supply them with food, drink and especially shelter to avoid hunters. For example, over the last decade, there have been about a significant decline of 90% in the quantity of tigers all over the world so they are taken to the zoos for preservation and even breeding programs. Secondly, zoos can provide teachers with supportive assistance to educate children about the unshaken importance of animals. The result of this is that the awareness of conserving the nature and endangered animals are highly reinforced and intensified. Evidently, hundreds of non-profit organizations and projects established with an aim to allocating a massive amount money to the combat against the extinction of some animals shed a light on the excessive concern of people about this issue. Consequently, there will be no need worrying about factors related to human beings intimidating the survival of animals so they are properly released from zoos to live at their own natural habitats.
In conclusion, although zoos-related issues are severe, its role in protection of wild animals should also be taken into thorough consideration by virtue of their advantages they can bring to animals.
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 89
- the diagram below shows the production of olive oil 61
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes 69
- Qualities which a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learnt at university or similar academic institutions Do you agree or disagree with this idea 89
- he following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 493.0 315.596192385 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93914807302 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76095385166 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52738336714 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2372780174 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.277777778 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3888888889 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210027206508 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685840484246 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587568013229 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152095179224 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601976862632 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.