Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some say that these are the best people to talk to school students about dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Crime education at schools has been of great importance in many countries. Some people claim that letting those ex-prisoners have a talk in front of school students is an excellent education method. Although I partially agree with the statement, schools, and government authorities should also take this responsibility. This essay will delve into the reasons for my opinion.
On the one hand, ex-offenders are believed to educate children well about the dangers that they might encounter when committing a crime via their own experience. Reformed offenders, for example, can tell young people about the discontent experience of a criminal lifestyle and what life in prison is really like which consequently helps dispel any misconceptions that youngsters have about criminals. Moreover, criminals that have been released and become productive members of society may motivate youths to pursue their aspirations. Clearly, the vivid nature of their stories has considerable impacts on students.
On the other hand, given that these used-to-be lawbreakers, in fact, have committed crimes in the past, it is vital for us to be conscious of the content of their speeches. As a result, these motivational speeches should be controlled carefully by schools and the government. Police, for example, should take responsibility for inspecting these criminals before and during giving a speech to ensure the effectiveness of the talk. In other words, other organizations should monitor these criminals in order to protect children.
In conclusion, talk given by ex-offenders is necessary for informing students. However, I believe that schools and government should also coordinate to ensure the effectiveness of these speeches. Should these parties combined, children are well educated which consequently contributes greatly to crime prevention.
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some say that these are the best people to talk to school students about dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s lives and it is waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6884057971 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0961454039 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9575602343 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228086891979 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683565430439 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609056700781 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131644838397 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484872419584 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.