Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students the danger of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree?
doing time might be a good way for criminals because some of them who have done that become moral citizens later. therefore, some people believe that students talking to these people is the best way to educate them about the danger of committing crime. In my opinion, I totally agree with this viewpoint due to these reasons.
First of all, criminals are those who have committed crime and when they have been caught, they will be sent to a prison to do time there. Thus, allowing students talking to these people is a best way to teach them about the bad consequences they might face with if they intend to commit any crimes. when they come back to their regular lives after spending time in prison, it could be extremely difficult for them to socialize with the others or find a job.they will have to start from scratch after having been in prison for years. Moreover, spending their time in prison means that they could miss all important events of their families and friends and also lost contact with many of their relationships.
Secondly, those people are considerably reliable and experimental. they have no reasons to lie these students, therefore all the stories about what they have been through are trustworthy. students would not suspect the authenticity of the stories and educating them would be much more efficient. All the students need is a “living proof” to talk and listen to them in a direct way.
In conclusion, good citizens who have been in prison before are the best to educate children about how risky committing crime could be. From my perspective, schools should soon apply this method so as to see the efficiency it could bring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | Kuldeep Kumar | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-10 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | amelieee | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Doing
doing time might be a good way for criminals ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... done that become moral citizens later. therefore, some people believe that students talk...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ing students talking to these people is a best way to teach them about the bad co...
^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...th if they intend to commit any crimes. when they come back to their regular lives a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...considerably reliable and experimental. they have no reasons to lie these students, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...they have been through are trustworthy. students would not suspect the authenticity of t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ore efficient. All the students need is a 'living proof' to talk and li...
^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a direct way" with adverb for "direct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... proof' to talk and listen to them in a direct way. In conclusion, good citizens who ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., schools should soon apply this method so as to see the efficiency it could bring.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52353344619 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7757327653 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38600968933 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135542729022 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109317408075 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23755577711 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102080013202 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.