Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people believe that prisoners tend to become better inhabitants after jail time, and it is said that these committed citizens will be the right people to express to young people about the dangerous crime. In my viewpoint, I agree with that statement.
Schools often use some alternative methods which may have less effective in educating learners. Firstly, teachers usually talk to their students about the dark side of criminals through films or news. Therefore, teenagers will suspect the accuracy of given information because these films sometimes are made up and did not base on real situations. Secondly, police officers can talk exactly to adolescents about criminal cases such as drugs additive, but they often lack experience of these committing. For example, the officers can not share or express their feeling with teenagers about the status of the temptation of heroin because they have never tried it before.
I presume that using re-formed citizens have two advantages. On the one hand, young people tend to believe ex-offenders who had real experiences about criminals. For instance, these ex-prisoners can describe how hard feelings of the additive of morphine and how they have to struggle when they can not find this substance. On the other hand, they also can share with teenagers about the difficult time when they were in jail to warn and deter the listeners from committing crimes. Besides, when they offend a crime and go to prison, their families also are affected by investigating, which comes from police officers, and the discrimination of society.
In conclusion, I absolutely agree that ex-offenders will be better citizens, and they are a good example for teenagers about committing crimes.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 73
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs, and the discrimination of society. In conclusion, I absolutely agree that e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27797833935 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75192567459 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9713056889 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266224422387 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892251357377 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666789252728 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174288515624 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729152801157 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.