Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and so it is often argued
that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are many opinions that believe that old prisoners who turned to a useful individual in society are a great example for teenagers. This perspective is relied on the claim that these old prisoners are the best people to talk to young people about the dangers of crime. This essay will argue why old prisoners who became good citizens are the best to make teenagers aware of that although presence of some opinions opposing that.
In fact, some people have always worries about dealing with former prisoners even if they turned into good citizens. Firstly, some former prisoners are not qualified or equipped enough to talk to teenagers due to their low levels of communication. Secondly, there is some potential risks that these old prisoners may glorify their past unintentionally which would lead to bad consequences on audiences of teenagers.
Despite these concerns by some people, former prisoners certainly are considered the authentic and reliable source for making teenagers aware. There is no doubt that these old prisoners have authenticity and credibility which others might lack. Their personal story of suffering due to crime would be more impactful on youth than other’s advice. Moreover, reformed prisoners are considered a great example of the possibility of change, thus, their stories would effectively inspire others and give them hope.
This essay argued that some people who considered talks of former prisoners to teenagers aren’t the best way to make them aware of dangers of crime. In my opinion, that claim isn’t realistic, where former prisoners are the most people who have the authenticity and credibility to talk to youth and their stories have the reliability to be told to teenagers
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- Some people believe that pets can be beneficial to children Conversely others think this can be unsafe and risky Both beliefs will be discussed in this essay 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 84
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 70
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in fact, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23381294964 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68280943923 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503597122302 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9409120259 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332074387209 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138324758865 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978647821454 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227947475029 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860374488709 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.