Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are various views for working in the same organisations for a long time. Some could think it would be benefits to do so for comfortable and the development relationship with co-workers. However, working in different organisation can enhance adaptability and flexibility skills. Therefore, I believe that the improvement of social skills especially adaptation and flexibility would be more beneficial than that of feeling comfortable and building a business relationship.
Working in the same organisation can provide the feeling of comfortable, convenience and security. Always having the repetitive working cycles; same environments, same co-workers and same tasks or projects, could provide the feeling of security and comfortable. Since the nature of people is a risk adverse, avoid the changes and challenges, many would prefer to work in a same organisation. Also, there are opportunities to build a business relationship with co-workers. When people are working at the same company for a long time, they can build a trust, honest and relationship with their co-workers and which can easily become a business partner. Therefore, working within the companies for a long time can bring a benefit of feeling of comfortable, convenience and security as well as building a business relationship with colleagues.
On the other hand, working in different organisations can have several advantages. To start with, people can learn the adaptation. Since they have to get used to new environment, new projects or new people, their adaptation skills will be improved. If they are working in different organisations in different countries, they might have to learn other skills related to the cultures (languages, customs and tradition, for example). Furthermore, people can get flexibility by working for different companies. Different companies have different visions and organising styles, which can influence on person's flexibility in work schedules. Some companies may be free with their workings whereas other companies may be strict with the working hours. For instance, Google is one of the most open with flexible working scheduled companies in the whole world, whereas Ernst & Young is known for the strict working schedules. Therefore, by working in different companies would enhance people's adaptation and flexibility.
In my opinion, I understand the comfortable feelings for working in a company can bring a person with a security and there will be having more chances to build a relationship with a co-worker which can develop to a business partner. However, this can be seemed as an “if”, because it is not always the case. In the case of my friend, David has worked for the Deloitte for more than 20 years but he has not developed any business relationship with any of their colleagues or tries to convince their customers to be his own. Likewise, not everyone would be getting the opportunities to change the long time relationship into a business relationship. Even though the feeling of comfortable and convenience seems easy lifestyles, the adaptation and flexibility will enhance people broaden their views. Therefore, the opportunities to learn about the adaptation and flexibility would be more advantageous than that of comfortable working lifestyles.
In conclusion, there are both aspects for working in a company for a long time. People can feel comfortable, convenience and security by working in the same organisations for a long time but they would not be able to learn other skills such as flexibility and adaptability. These can be learnt by changing the organisations. By doing that, people can be able to broaden their horizons.
- Smoking is not only harm the smoker, but also those who nearby. Therefore, smoking should be baned in public places. To what extent do you agre or disagree? 67
- Some people think that the role of parents is to discipline their children and teach them about right and wrong Other people consider that the main responsibility of parents is to nurture their children and provide them with a safe environment to grow up 93
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 84
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is beneficial for them. Why?What are the possible solutions to encourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ganising styles, which can influence on persons flexibility in work schedules. Some com...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'likewise', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'whereas', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as well as', 'in my opinion', 'to start with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248062015504 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.145736434109 0.155533422707 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0883720930233 0.0946595960268 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0341085271318 0.0501214627716 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031007751938 0.0437548338989 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124031007752 0.122226691241 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0496124031008 0.0403226058552 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.19322818448 2.80594681477 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248062015504 0.0326793684256 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0945736434109 0.0861772015684 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.046511627907 0.021408717616 217% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0077519379845 0.011925033212 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3673.0 1933.35771543 190% => OK
No of words: 575.0 316.048096192 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.38782608696 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.20517956788 116% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393043478261 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.332173913043 0.28420135186 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238260869565 0.203846283523 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.186086956522 0.137316102897 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19322818448 2.80594681477 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.037074148 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.389565217391 0.56093040696 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.9351766097 60.7387585426 76% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0891783567 180% => Less sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 19.8275862069 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6737953139 49.517814964 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.655172414 127.492653851 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8275862069 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.655172413793 0.814263465372 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 53.0449775112 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.69124875643 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337817175199 0.332605444948 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151210507208 0.102741220458 147% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106819254973 0.0668466124924 160% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494401813619 0.534860350844 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117627841911 0.148594505496 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127095464677 0.134430193775 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500409888163 0.0742795772207 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410954170656 0.324371583561 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0697446658342 0.0638462369009 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238884612389 0.228012699653 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225327067948 0.058150111329 39% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 8.68436873747 242% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 19.0 5.90881763527 322% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 26.0 10.4468937876 249% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.