Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are various views for working in the same organisations for a long time. Some could think it would be benefits to do so for comfortable and the development relationship with co-workers. However, working in different organisation can enhance adaptability and flexibility skills. Therefore, I believe that the improvement of social skills especially adaptation and flexibility would be more beneficial than that of feeling comfortable and building a business relationship.
Working in the same organisation can provide the feeling of comfortable, convenience and security. Always having the repetitive working cycles; same environments, same co-workers and same tasks or projects, could provide the feeling of security and comfortable. Since the nature of people is a risk adverse, avoid the changes and challenges, many would prefer to work in a same organisation. Also, there are opportunities to build a business relationship with co-workers. When people are working at the same company for a long time, they can build a trust, honest and relationship with their co-workers and which can easily become a business partner. Therefore, working within the companies for a long time can bring a benefit of feeling of comfortable, convenience and security as well as building a business relationship with colleagues.
On the other hand, working in different organisations can have several advantages. To start with, people can learn the adaptation. Since they have to get used to new environment, new projects or new people, their adaptation skills will be improved. If they are working in different organisations in different countries, they might have to learn other skills related to the cultures (languages, customs and tradition, for example). Furthermore, people can get flexibility by working for different companies. Different companies have different visions and organising styles, which can influence on person's flexibility in work schedules. Some companies may be free with their workings whereas other companies may be strict with the working hours. For instance, Google is one of the most open with flexible working scheduled companies in the whole world, whereas Ernst & Young is known for the strict working schedules. Therefore, by working in different companies would enhance people's adaptation and flexibility.
In my opinion, I understand the comfortable feelings for working in a company can bring a person with a security and there will be having more chances to build a relationship with a co-worker which can develop to a business partner. However, this can be seemed as an “if”, because it is not always the case. In the case of my friend, David has worked for the Deloitte for more than 20 years but he has not developed any business relationship with any of their colleagues or tries to convince their customers to be his own. Likewise, not everyone would be getting the opportunities to change the long time relationship into a business relationship. Even though the feeling of comfortable and convenience seems easy lifestyles, the adaptation and flexibility will enhance people broaden their views. Therefore, the opportunities to learn about the adaptation and flexibility would be more advantageous than that of comfortable working lifestyles.
In conclusion, there are both aspects for working in a company for a long time. People can feel comfortable, convenience and security by working in the same organisations for a long time but they would not be able to learn other skills such as flexibility and adaptability. These can be learnt by changing the organisations. By doing that, people can be able to broaden their horizons.
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- Nowadays many offenders suffering from health problems such as obesity. What are reasons behind it and how it can be solved? 67
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 56
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an England town in 2012 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ganising styles, which can influence on persons flexibility in work schedules. Some com...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 7.85571142285 382% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3100.0 1615.20841683 192% => OK
No of words: 574.0 315.596192385 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40069686411 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19322818448 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390243902439 0.561755894193 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 978.3 506.74238477 193% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6737953139 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.896551724 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7931034483 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.62068965517 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 8.67935871743 242% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365040105146 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134695115124 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930921464384 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248737392625 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631829000172 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.