Having a job has always been as a crucial aspect, which establishes the life and social position of human beings. For people, who appreciate stability and peace, working in an only corporation as well as retiring from here is considered as a happy end. However, supporters of innovations and wide experience tend to function in varied job fields and locations in their working life span.
On the one hand, staying with the same company means to have regular salary, rewards and bonuses for hard working and deduction. For instance, some companies provide long-term credits with low percents for employers who are faithfully laboring in the company for particular span of years. Moreover, it promises to supply with a stable pension its retirees.
Another benefit of operating in a single organization is to avoid trouble. Transferring from company includes searching for a new apartment, transportation, also, adaptation to the unknown environment and climate. If employer is married and has a child, then they will change work, school, college and others. All of them require patience and extra payments.
On the other hand, remaining with an only organization may confine worker’s opportunities, practice as well. Sometimes in order to achieve success alteration of a current employing place can be a correct choice. Since between companies has always been a strong competition, therefore list of leading organizations are not permanent. Also, every corporation has its own rules and methods of working, therefore testing them can be a profitable experience in employer’s career path.
In conclusion, I deem, profession should supply laborer with enough income and experiment wherever he works. So as I support conservative mode, precisely, stable job place, because it is much more reliable and tested.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives the information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 to 2010
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below gives the information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 to 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m require patience and extra payments. On the other hand, remaining with an onl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42253521127 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99962802693 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661971830986 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.210175881 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.25 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176213089419 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475478552845 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530133788576 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869992727883 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066853382681 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.