some people work for the same organization

Essay topics:

some people work for the same organization

These days, when it comes to deciding what ways will their working life go, it has never been easier. Some people believe that they should work for their companies until their retirements. However, some people argue that they should seek a new job. This essay will discuss both sides of the arguments and try to give some conclusions.

Remaining in one organization may seem an excellent idea because people have built close relationships among their friends and boss therefore, they can contact other sections more easily and perfectly. In addition, the benefit of this point is that they continually keep pace in their work unless they need to resign. To illustrate, the more they have been loyal to their organizations, the more they are promoted and paid for their high salaries. Even though they become a chief executive officer or the highest part of their companies, they still have dead-end and make themselves unproductive and lazier.

A new life of a new company convinces them to more challenge and get more inspired due to different environments and socialize. They can start new attitudes and lifestyles if they used to face the toxic social or sexual harassment. Besides this, changing jobs teach them numerous ways such as adjusting yourself, flexibility, and making them proud of you. Learning ways of thinking in the new organization makes people have more knowledge and always improve themselves. For example, once you obtained every-week presentations from the old company, but for the new one, they give the job for you as a dealer so you have to develop your communicating skills. The best decision is to change their jobs.

In conclusion, both aspects have benefits and drawbacks including a fresh life and keeping pace. In my opinion, I recommend people to change the job if they have a chance to obtain more skills and become experts in every type of work.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-11 Lư Kim Ngân 56 view
2024-11-11 Lư Kim Ngân 56 view
2024-11-11 Helena12 73 view
2024-11-11 Helena12 73 view
2024-11-11 Helena12 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and try to give some conclusions. Remaining in one organization may seem a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...themselves unproductive and lazier. A new life of a new company convinces th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st decision is to change their jobs. In conclusion, both aspects have benefit...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00634920635 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68064364288 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4210263972 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194580873732 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698506257261 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769604160551 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131093256514 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748575803464 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.