Some say that for any country hosting an international sports events such as the Olympic games is costly, inefficient and is a waste of money, while others disagree.discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays there is a huge competition in hosting internationals sporting events like Olympics. People saying that the country need to spend massive amount of money to host such competitions. These lead some people to think the money is waste. But others disagree this statement.
Firstly hosting these kind of sporting event is not an easy task for a country. After finalised the hosting country, the particular country starts developing their infrastructure and gives lots of jobs to the local people. The local people may get influence by abroad sports people and this lead to more interest towards among young people. If a developing country had chance to host a sporting events. The country may develop before the projected year. For example, the hockey world cup 2018 is hosted by India, and the whole tournament was conducted in a state called Orissa. The main reason of this place is, the state is very backward among other states, so to develop, the government selected this state.
When a developing country spent huge amount on sporting event rather than education and health of people it is the worst idea and it is a waste of money. Because health I s a prime factor of sports, so the country should give first preference to health and education. For this issue, the football world cup which held in Brazil in the year 2014 is best example.
In my opinion, conducting mega sporting events is not a waste of money if properly executed. Some committee should be responsible for all the money involved and the expenses is should be transparent to people.
- Some say that for any country hosting an international sports events such as the Olympic games is costly, inefficient and is a waste of money, while others disagree.discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The diagrams below show the design for a wafe energy machine and its location. 73
- Question- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...gree this statement. Firstly hosting these kind of sporting event is not an easy task f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re interest towards among young people. If a developing country had chance to host...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...g country had chance to host a sporting events. The country may develop before the pro...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...azil in the year 2014 is best example. In my opinion, conducting mega sporting ...
^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: SOME_FACULTY[1]
Message: Use 'committee members'.
Suggestion: committee members
...ste of money if properly executed. Some committee should be responsible for all the money...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...all the money involved and the expenses is should be transparent to people.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, for example, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91729323308 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59346186291 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.406586177 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27566189026 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931909740775 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575485084818 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173438097666 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444759748175 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.