Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university. What are the advantages or disadvantages for their study?
There are lots of people assuming that education is the backbone of children, therefore, they need to follow it thoroughly. Meanwhile, others argue that spending time off school for a period before applying for university is also a good choice for young adults, nowadays. Yet, taking this gap brings students both pros and cons which are going to be discussed in this passage.
On the one hand, the most significant strength of postponing higher education for particular purposes is beneficial in acquiring pragmatic experiences. It is undisputed that knowledge from books does play an indispensable role in studying but those practical acquaintances can only be acknowledged through actual experience. Furthermore, this is also a valuable opportunity to train their skill set. For instance, by working or travelling by themselves, they would probably have to learn how to deal with unpredictable issues using their acquired proficiency. As a result, the youth can also sharpen their skillset and attain to be more mature and proficient.
On the other hand, despite its immense merits, deferring tertiary education is undeniably disruptive to the process of studying. Both working and traveling requires an enormous amount of time focusing on it so when coming back, it would be a burden for them to catch up with their peers. Consequently, anxiety, peer pressure, and depression will take place understandably. In addition, having gap years may unintentionally make the students lose their relish for gaining knowledge due to an adequate payment factor in working. There are some young people who believe that studying is merely to earn a satisfying amount of money. Therefore, when they can earn money on their own without continuing their education, they will definitely have no reason to follow their curriculums.
To conclude, while delaying university can have beneficial results for studying purposes by broadening students’ knowledge, it also brings detrimental effects to this process. Thus, before taking a gap, each individual should consider all of its ramifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-31 | dinhthu05 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-30 | dinhphuonglinh | 89 | view |
- The following line graph shows the percentage of two modes of traveling in Vancouver from 1990 to 2015 Summarize the information by reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 59
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making compari 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...tances can only be acknowledged through actual experience. Furthermore, this is also a valuable o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45987654321 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04023939116 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6907264182 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258573057242 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708470888819 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750740204589 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150657559856 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422003686882 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.