Some teachers tend to reward students with high academic results. Others, however, support and reward students that improved their grades. Discuss both approaches. Give your opinion and provide examples.
It has been a trend rewarding the students for what they achieved academically. While some educational practitioners prone to give a performance appraisal to the students who successfully obtained higher results, others, meanwhile, argue that giving a special gift for those who managed to improve academic results significantly should also be included as the awardees.
Firstly, proponents contend that while the students have good academic results, they should be rewarded by the teachers as a form of valuing their hard-work. The students would keep motivated and probably improve themselves tow...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-04-28 | bocahnakal | 74 | view |
- The percentage of smokers and consumption of alcohol in selected countries 84
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 80
- The Comparison between USA and Japan in spending money on apparel between 1999 and 2003 90
- The percentage of attending arts events in some reasons 88
- The way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 - 2006 70
While some educational practitioners prone to give a performance appraisal to the students who successfully obtained higher results
While some educational practitioners are prone to give a performance appraisal to the students who are successfully obtained higher results
Sentence: While some educational practitioners prone to give a performance appraisal to the students who successfully obtained higher results, others, meanwhile, argue that giving a special gift for those who managed to improve academic results significantly should also be included as the awardees.
Error: awardees Suggestion: ?
flaws:
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
'On the other hand' means However. It doesn't mean 'On another hand'.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 325 350
No. of Characters: 1727 1500
No. of Different Words: 173 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.246 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.314 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.032 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.695 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.4 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.582 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5