Some young people like to copy the behaviour and clothes of famous people today. Why might this be the case? What problems can it cause?
It is a recent issue that famous people successfully captivate several cutting-edge generations to mirror their characteristic and fashion. There are several causes and problems from this tropical issue which will be elucidated more below.
Regarding the causes, mimicking influence people’s attitudes by young generation is caused by self-determination. According to psychologist, young generation which exist in unstable behavior tend to search inspiration from popular person. Moreover, public recognition is one of the major reasons young generation imitating star idol outfit. Following wearing the newest vogue style, using trendy styles in their daily outfit significantly contribute them to attract public interest. consequently, the more they imitate trendy vogue, they higher receiving the sense of satisfaction will be.
Turning the problems, excessively mimicking people characteristic significantly inflict self-crisis. In connection with massive technology development, they easily access information about their idol lifestyle which cause them to adopt these. This significantly erode the traditional norm which had hold from-time-to time, consequently, their children are becoming unfamiliar with origin characteristic. In addition, imitating artist wearing luxury brand greatly extravaganza their parent’s budget who live in poor condition. Instead of stop this habit, public interest addictions significantly contribute them to submit huge loan which will influence mental health issue. If they difficultly dealt with these, they possible conduct suicide which will hurt their parent feeling.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, the causes of reflecting behavior and outfit are finding self-identity and public recognition. Meanwhile, the problems of this greatly erode self-characteristic and expense cost.
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ribute them to attract public interest. consequently, the more they imitate trendy vogue, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving the sense of satisfaction will be. Turning the problems, excessively mimick...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.348 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29514794812 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9814733091 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133412886854 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500324245489 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472357738728 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948651092898 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042943673447 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.25 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ribute them to attract public interest. consequently, the more they imitate trendy vogue, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving the sense of satisfaction will be. Turning the problems, excessively mimick...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.348 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29514794812 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9814733091 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133412886854 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500324245489 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472357738728 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948651092898 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042943673447 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.25 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.