In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Hunger in poor countries has been an issue for a long time. Though there are developments in agriculture that are expected to help these people suffering from poverty, they are still hungry as if nothing has changed. This essay will outline several points on why the problem still persists and what can be done to alleviate the problem.
To begin with, there are three major reasons why this issue is still happening. First and foremost, the advances in agriculture mainly happened in rich countries and not in poor countries. Since these poor countries have no budget and have a lot of concerns to think of, they might not focus on improving their agriculture, instead focus on the immediate problem and address it first. while rich countries have enough budget that they can allocate some money to improve their agriculture. In addition to that, people may be uneducated that they rely so much on what will be given to them and does not know what to do about it and how can they help themselves. For instance, they may be given a budget to help with their farming but instead, it will be used on other things and not for their plantations. Lastly, these people may be exploited by rich people and taken advantage of because they are illiterate.
Turning to possible solutions, to start with, rich countries should provide a helping hand to these poor countries in boosting their economy. Also, the government should also educate its' citizen to be able to let these smaller people learn how to decide for themselves and know what to do to whatever resources are available to them. Educating them also allows them to have the knowledge and to be not fooled by anyone.
Overall, though improvements in agriculture are made, people still go hungry due to their country's poor situation and has no capacity to support its people, the citizens are uneducated and, exploited. In view of these, other countries that are well-off may give aid and it will be mainly the governments' responsibility to educate its' people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | yasinyucesan | 95 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | choco_fans | 11 | view |
- The table below shows the mothly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The table below shows some data regarding Australia s nursing employment and total workforce in 1987 and 2001 87
- Employers giving employees a 4 week holiday.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...immediate problem and address it first. while rich countries have enough budget that ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...immediate problem and address it first. while rich countries have enough budget that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... may give aid and it will be mainly the governments responsibility to educate its people.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, to begin with, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85507246377 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58471424766 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4780204603 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219716091746 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798517001736 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831064620837 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139925552874 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759508436054 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.