In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Although noticeable progress has been already made in agriculture technology, there are still many people suffering from famine around the world, especially Africa. Plenty of factors contribute to this phenomenon, while many measures are necessary to be implemented.
There is no doubt that most famines occurred in the countries which are at war against each other. In other words, as the war would destroy the houses as well as any other buildings, it’s extremely hard for the farmers to settle down and work in the fields, leading a huge decline of the food production, which might eventually cause the famine.
Besides the detrimental effects brought by wars on farming, a lack of advanced equipment as well as techniques would certainly be critical factors of meager agricultural products. In contrast with uses of equipment, to cultivate the soil only with hands is much more inefficient and not productive. In addition to that, some agricultural knowledge needs to be imparted to farmers in order to achieve the highest output level, while many of them might not be educated and lack the basic farming techniques.
A number of measures can be considered in order to save these suffering people. For example, it’s unlikely to develop a powerful agricultural system without a peaceful environment. Therefore, endless wars between these developing nations have to be stopped with the corporation of other nations. Furthermore, a number of capital would be instrumental for agricultural development and need to be lent as the form of either equipment or financial assistance. Or, sending several engineer teams can play a crucial role in infrastructure construction, which brings numerous benefits to development of not only agriculture but tremendous areas of related areas.
In a conclusion, support from developed nations would be conducive to tackle this problem and eliminate the famine from the world.
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- It is generally believed that some people are horn with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can he taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 56
- Today the high sales o f popular consumer goods reflect the power o f advertising and not the real needs o f the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ors of meager agricultural products. In contrast with uses of equipment, to cultivate th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, no doubt, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38741721854 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99367233208 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0211885115 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212727303627 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719940804761 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621853784726 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123202292276 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873938814872 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.