Even after introducing new methods in farming, hunger rates have not declined all over the world. This essay will examine the main causes of this issue and possible solutions to tackle the problem.
The principal reason behind the rise in global hunger is inflation of food items. As majority of the people are unemployed in today's world, it is not possible to afford overly priced food. Number of taxes are imposed on any edible. People living below poverty line are not able to buy food stuff, and in lieu, they choose to remain hungry. Moreover, the wastage of food is rising all over the world. This egregious abandonment of staples deprives others from destroying their hunger. Also, when there is a case of war or conflicts, the prices of groceries automatically go up, worsening the global hunger situation.
Some possible solutions to reduce the rates of starvation is to reduce the taxes which ultimately will result in decrease in the prices of consumeables. Also, the government should provide employment to the public so that they will not have to depend on decrease in prices as they would be able to pay for it. Moreover, there should be separate funding system in the case of wars so that government does not have to inflate the food items. Public can also help to deal with this problem by donating some amount of money to charities thay work for people not getting enough food. Government should be austere in the matters of food wastage as well.
To conclude, the various causes behind the global starvation can be tackled if the government authorities and the public work together. Otherwise, one alone can not bring visible results.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing Discuss the causes and solutions 84
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones why Do you think this is a positive or negative trend 84
- technological progress in the past century has its negative effect despite its remarkable contribution do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49378282314 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8691751408 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161213298115 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515630880339 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438666207487 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100878935881 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240263649784 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.