In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The majority of the population around the globe are still suffering from hunger, although there are lots of advancement in agricultural technology. This situation is due to the lower economic condition of people and this issue can be solved by focusing on cheaper and geographically suitable means of technology.
Many people in the world are still below the poverty level due to which greater advancements are not in the reach of the majority of farmers. Moreover, all the middle-class farmers are still stalking the subsistence type of farming practices and those farmers themself are not able to grow sufficient food for themselves. For instance, the majority of Nepalese farmers are middle class and they cannot grow food for themselves year-round from traditional agriculture.
This problem can be solved by innovating low-cost technology which is suitable for all ranges of farmers. This technology can increase the efficiency of production, which in turn contributes to growing more food and assists in solving the problem of hunger. For example, the development of cheaper greenhouses helps to increase the production of agricultural commodities in the hilly region of Nepal and plays a significant role in solving the problem of food deficit. Furthermore, geographically suitable technology can be easily adopted by farmers. Small and easily accessible technology has a greater rate of adoption and it assists in greater productivity.
In conclusion, because of the lack of economic resources, farmers are insisted to adopt traditional methods which results in lower production and the problem of food scarcity; meanwhile, easily accessible technologies which are cheap and suitable in all area helps to curtail the food shortage issue.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50740740741 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09058706317 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4951544766 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196125352505 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853515739888 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686521772277 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121199318272 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837383828246 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.