In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case ? What can be done about this problem?
In many countries, a significant number of advances have been made regarding the agriculture industry. Despite those changes, many people around the world still suffer from hunger. While there are a number of causes relating to this matter, several solutions can be brought up to solve this problem.
To begin with, one of the main reasons many people still go hungry is because they cannot afford to buy the food. This is especially true for low income countries, where the economic growth rate is very low, which in turns can cause high unemployment rate. Because people do not have a job, they are lack of financial capability to meet the basic needs and ensure their well-beings. In other words, they do not have enough money to buy food and as a result, those people go starving. Countries in Africa like South Sudan or Kenya are notable examples for this case. Due to the undeveloped economy that has been the major cause to this problem, most people in those countries have to live under harsh conditions and there is little they can do to improve it themselves.
Nevertheless, the situation can still be improved if appropriate measures are taken to tackle this problem. One of the most important solutions is the required changes in the government policies and regulations, especially those of low-income countries. Governments should develop and maintain a care program for people that are currently suffering from hunger. Furthermore, they can also create more opportunities by providing more jobs, hence increase the possibilities of improving their living conditions whilst raising the growth rate of the economy.
All in all, there are several reasons why many people in the world still go hungry in spite of the development in agriculture. Regardless, if this problem can be tackled in an appropriate way, the situation can definitely be improved considerably in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | Tran Mai Phuong | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information, report main features and make comparison where necessary 67
- The diagram below shows the process from Australian Bureau of Meteorology of collecting up-to-minute information for the purpose of producting reliable weather forecasts.Describe the process in detail. 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 92
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The first chart shows the energy use in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from the energy use.Summarise the information below, report changes and make comparisons where necessary 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ardless, if this problem can be tackled in an appropriate way, the situation can definitely be improv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, well, while, as a result, in other words, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78083986386 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3256302038 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364600954707 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117793552602 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819801177004 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24563420302 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100139122089 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.