In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
With the development of modern technology agriculture has come a long way. It’s techniques have improved over time a lot. Yet many people in different ares go hungry. The reason behind this could be that the advancements have not reached to those people. Also, climate conditions and the different socio-economic conditions of those areas are responsible for this.
Agriculture in modern times has changed a lot from the past. As a result, the production of crops have increased to a significant amount, which is often more than enough to feed the whole population of the world. Still people go hungry could be because many areas of the world have not yet received the advantages of the technologies and methods. Many of them still rely upon the old and inefficient methods of farming, which lead to hunger for the ever growing population.
Climatic and environmental condition of many areas are not suitable for farming. People have to go through numerous natural calamities like hurricane, tsunami, tornado etc which devastate the production of crops. Also, due to global warming and pollution soil is being affected, leading to poor quality of crops. Socio-economic conditions of different regions are also sometimes responsible for the problem. Due to management incompetency and lack of uniform distribution of food may exceed the advantages gained by the advances in agriculture.
To solve this huge crisis, research to grow durable and high quality crops should be performed more. We also need to make sure that technological advancements and new methods for agriculture reach distant corners of the planet. Also necessary steps should be taken to prevent further global warming and pollution. Proper distribution of food within specific regions as well as all over the world can be another effective measure.
So to conclude, only agricultural advancement is not enough to solve the overall food crisis in the world. There are many other factors that are also need to be assessed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | yasinyucesan | 95 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | choco_fans | 11 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computers is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroleectric power plant. 56
- "During the past year, workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. A recent government study reports that fatigue and s 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...re reach distant corners of the planet. Also necessary steps should be taken to prev...
^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...re are many other factors that are also need to be assessed.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.246105919 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91907459592 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6723777274 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.05 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194635299232 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578883259096 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662041762083 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111772347443 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384364378351 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.