Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views of whether oral communication is more effective than correspondence or not. Personally, deciding which one is more powerful than the other one relies on certain circumstances.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why I suppose spoken transmittion is a powerful tool. When it comes to the situation requiring body language and facial expression, spoken language is much better than written one. Because it enables the speakers to convey not only information but also their tone and emtion. As a result, the listeners will be prone to be easily persuaded and receptive. Take the advertiments and product marketing as an example, the public will have tendecy to be deeply impressed and persuasive by the enthusiam and promises of marketing staff, rather than just read a product description on screen in the Internet.
On the other hand, it is rational for me to say that written forms should be prioritized over the oral one. Admittedly, spoken transmittion is extremely time-saving and convenient. However, this types communication cannot be used in law and business. In fact, signing a business contract, which is legal agreement between two or more parties ivolving in, must use written forms to ensure that all participants have to comply with the regulations and keep their promises. In addition, correspondence forms hold real and convincing attribute. Therefore, it can be used as a valid evidence when conflicts arise.
In conclusion, it seems to me that both kinds of communication are absolutely essential. In some cases, oral communication is more effective due to full conveying of both information and emtion, but there are some situations written is preferable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Goverments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 47
- The chart gives information about the proportion of students choosing different science subjects in a university in 1992 and 2000 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssed and persuasive by the enthusiam and promises of marketing staff, rather than...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...me that both kinds of communication are absolutely essential. In some cases, oral communication is m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30036630037 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10090514439 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8434164931 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217423577312 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666414894984 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555600587186 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140609778394 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498053122456 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.