You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
(Write at least 150 words)
The line graph compares the amount of several kinds of meat consumed by each European per week during the period of 25 years from 1979. Each unit is measured in grams.
Overall, while there was a general downward trend in the consumption of beef, lamb, and fish, the opposite was true for that of chicken.
In fact, the quantity of beef stood at over 200 in 1979, which was 150 higher than that of fish. Similarly, a slight decrease in the utilization of both beef and fish was recorded in the first 2 years. However, the amount of beef saw a wild fluctuation between a high of under 250 and a low of over 100; whereas, the quantity of fish remained stable at around 50 throughout the remainder of the period.
Another striking feature is that chicken and lamb witnessed a contrast tendency. By the end of 2004, chicken figures boomed by over 100 and hit the peak at 250. Meanwhile, the figure for lamb declined significantly from exactly 150 in 1979 to 50 in 2004- which was the lowest point in all time.
- The graph below shows the average monthly temperature in three major cities 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 74
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this a positive or negative situation 89
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Goverments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a positive and negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5597826087 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40872483698 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0459299212 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112941427071 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441971439314 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311779330157 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672179551483 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021775468309 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.