The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph illustrates European country in eating fish and some different kinds of meat between 1979 and 2004. It can be seen from the graph that fish is the less consumption and chicken is the most, where beef and lamb are in the middle.
Europeans consuming chicken increases from year to year. In 1979, people eat slightly below 150 grams per week until in 2004 it becomes 250 grams per week. Compared to fish, people’s interest in eating fish steadily decreased from a little above 50 grams to around 50 grams per person per week.
Lamb and beef consumption has decreased quite significantly. People eat beef from 200 grams to about 100 grams per week, although in mid-1979 and 1984 it experienced an increase from under 200 grams to around 250 grams but until 2004 it continued to decline. People’s enthusiasm with lamb starts from 150 grams and decreases to around 50 grams per week.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- the diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building induustry summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 17
- The graph below shows how people buy music 55
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV Do you agree 56
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the tourist by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 724 1000
No. of Different Words: 87 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.641 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.359 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 30 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.48 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.148 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4