The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The diagram gives information the percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar in four meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks) consumed in America. The percentages of three nutrients are not health if it is consumed too much. Generally, dinner and lunch that individuals in America eat are saturated fat and sodium, while snack has high percentage of added sugar.
America humans consume added sugar, sodium and saturated fat during breakfast is lower around 14 to 16%. These nutrients is higher in food items they eat during lunch and dinner. The lunch they eat comprises of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar (29%, 26%, 20%, respectively). They consume more higher percentages of these nutrients, which are not good for health when eat too much, while they heave their dinner. The nutrient of sodium, saturated fats and sugar during dinner are 43%, 37% and 23% respectively. Finally, snacks which they eat consist high sugar and fats, 42% and 21%, respectively, and the sugar in snacks is higher than dinner and lunch.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- the diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building induustry summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 17
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the tourist by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...lower around 14 to 16%. These nutrients is higher in food items they eat during lu...
^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ng lunch and dinner. The lunch they eat comprises of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dinner. The lunch they eat comprises of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar 2...
^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...%, 26%, 20%, respectively. They consume more higher percentages of these nutrients, which a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52051101536 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7225983212 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100603396769 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678383752024 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886865242584 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100421733569 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366101178383 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.