Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that verbal communication is more crucial than written one. I disagree with this idea because I believe that both ways play equally important roles in communicating of humans.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why humankind prefers speaking. To begin with, if humans talk with each other, problems can be solved faster, compared to exchanging texts. This is extremely beneficial in urgent situations when people need to exchange information and receive a response immediately. Furthermore, speaking will allow humans to express positive emotions easily and faster than writing. This lead to better connections between people, especially family bonds between members as well as the unity of members in an organization.
On the other hand, despite the justifications mentioned above, non-verbal exchange is as vital as verbal one. Firstly, by taking a note, people might make a historic record after that. This would reap benefits for researching history when next generations might learn lessons from the past through historical document and evidence, thereby avoiding the repetition of the errors in the future. Secondly, when being angry, writers are able to avoid causing psychological traumas to others being around. This is because people who are into writing are likely to curb their negative feelings such as resentment or sadness and express them in documents instead of talking to opposite talkers.
In conclusion, although many people think that spoken methods is greater than written one, I am of the belief that both spoken and written transferring is equally essential in communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: HISTORIC_RECORD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'historical record'?
Suggestion: historical record
..., by taking a note, people might make a historic record after that. This would reap benefits fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82393295286 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687747035573 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8473684042 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126753542881 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047485231198 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888921114749 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110715841945 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111202360692 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: HISTORIC_RECORD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'historical record'?
Suggestion: historical record
..., by taking a note, people might make a historic record after that. This would reap benefits fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82393295286 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687747035573 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8473684042 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126753542881 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047485231198 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888921114749 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110715841945 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111202360692 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.