Students are becoming more and more reliant on technology. What are some of the problems associated with reliance on computers, and what are some of the possible solutions?
Learners are becoming dependent on technology more than ever before, for instance, the internet and mobile devices. This essay identifies the main problems associated with the dependence on technology are the lack of original thought and copying original work from others, and suggests critical thinking and plagiarism checker software as the most convenient solutions.
At present, students can find almost anything with just only a few clicks on their phones. Although this enabled easy information access, the misuse of it can lead to a catastrophe. There are many websites that provide ready-made answers, and more surprisingly, many students directly copy their scripts from these sources. If the students continue this trend, the effect on their critical thinking will be terrible. They will eventually lose their ability to think by relying too much on available materials. Furthermore, plagiarism is a very shameful act. Copying others' work and then claiming it as your own is one of the most notorious sins. And AI writing programs accelerated this trend more than ever. Using these Ai tools, it is effortless to copy others' work which can be done undetected, and these activities discourage the original writers from working hard.
However, as there is a will, there is always a way, and these problems are no exception. Students' critical thinking ability should be enhanced by introducing programs in the curriculum that reward profound thinking ability. Furthermore, the development of a proper plagiarism-detecting tool is the most urgent need. These solutions will be able to eradicate our problems at least to some extent.
In conclusion, the dependence on technology has both its advantages and demerits. Wrong use of technology can lead to dreadful outcomes like plagiarism and losing the ability to think deeply while classes about critical thinking and checking softwares can reduce these outcomes to a minimal level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Md. Tasin Talukder | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Md. Tasin Talukder | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | kittupari | 61 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | sudheerssmg | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | Qudrat2003 | 84 | view |
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on technology What are some of the problems associated with reliance on computers and what are some of the possible solutions 67
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on technology What are some of the problems associated with reliance on computers and what are some of the possible solutions 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n technology has both its advantages and demerits. Wrong use of technology can le...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40924092409 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90532159912 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1538846268 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4117647059 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140382409018 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431567105402 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447525416362 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872467568862 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414839824005 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.