Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days,it is obviously observed that the trend of teaching academic knowledge for student to overcome the exams and skills like cooking dressing should not be imparted. Although this trend can be positive but my viewpoint that skills is more significant.
On the one hand,it is true that academic knowledge is a flawless tool to provide knowledge and evaluate each students.Nowadays,there are a bunch of measures to teach,adopted subjects in school and pelicular courses throught e-learning and so on.Academic knowledge such as math,geometry,chemistry,etc... are the most explicit examples.They touch on the knotty and abstract or even ridiculous understanding. These figures help us raise awareness,enhance mindset,become be outsmart,all these things are the chief basis of success. The benefit does not stop at this point,it also uses to advance value of people,creating a platform for judging students throughout matriculation examination and facilitate chances to achieve a place in the sun,even that target is cried for the moon.
On the other hand,academic knowledge occupies almost unpractical knowledge,it does not have many effects on real life.So we need to nevigate the method which strikes the balance of each other. Students are needed to teach some realistic skills in this era. Such as dressing and cooking skill.... They bring numberous benefits for future,saving time and detering from time-comsuming situation. In my opinion,the risks that students lack of skills are existing intangablely. We must act to bully a fraction of teaching academic knowledge.
To sum up,academic knowledge is useful,reflect the improvement of students but we do not abuse that.Consequently,we should modify both of them reasonablely In order to reduce burden on students’shoulder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | supermanminh512 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Nguyen Hung | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r handacademic knowledge occupies almost unpractical knowledgeit does not have m...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies almost unpractical knowledgeit does not have many effects on real lifeSo we ...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y opinionthe risks that students lack of skills are existing intangablely We must...
^^
Line 6, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he improvement of students but we do not abuse thatConsequentlywe should modify b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, such as, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56015037594 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53842487026 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 266.0 20.2975951904 1311% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1479.0 106.682146367 1386% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 266.0 20.7667163134 1281% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 97.0 7.06120827912 1374% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281647873576 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.281647873576 0.084324248473 334% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167332650607 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807694620713 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 137.8 13.0946893788 1052% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -215.43 50.2224549098 -429% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.3001002004 968% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.45 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.17 8.58950901804 258% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.4 10.1190380762 1071% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.7795591182 575% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.