Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person. Why do you think this is the case? What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Currently, the occurrence of youngsters preferring to engage in online conversation rather than meeting up in person is a topical issue as so many nations are seeing this pattern. This essay will analyze the major cause and propose a possible solution to this situation.
First of all, the foremost reason making young adults preferred to socialize online is the explosive growth of social media. One possible explanation for this is that with the advent of technology, social networking sites such as Facebook and Instagram are beginning to take over person-to-person interaction. In other words, owing to the instant access to the Internet everywhere and at any time with a smartphone, social networks enable them to keep in touch with faraway friends more effortlessly via messaging, calling or even seeing each other’s faces on the screen. A recent report published by the Science and Society magazine in Vietnam points out that nearly 40% of teenagers in Vietnam opts to make video calls on Facebook instead of spending time with their friend outdoors. With all this taken into account, social networking sites are the factor creating a cyberspace for the young generation to interact.
This problem, however, can be effectively tackled by education. As for parents, they should instill a sense of being sociable into their children by encouraging them to invite friends to come over, thereby forming a social connection among them and resulting in allotting more time to meet face-to-face. As for schools, team building activities and field trips should be incorporated more in the curriculum in order for students to enjoy the feeling of companionship, fostering the tendency to let that cheerful atmosphere happen again by meeting in person more. A recent survey data from the Health and Life magazine suggests that teenagers who often involve in outdoor activities with their friends at schools incline towards reducing the time spending on social online platforms. That is why I agree that education is an effective solution to this issue.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that the rapid development of social networks causes young people to prefer interacting online to having meetings in real life. People, nevertheless, can lessen this problem through education. Although it is unlikely to be eliminated in the short term, there are concrete steps to reduce the effects it is having on the current society.
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 88
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- 3 A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Write about the following topic:Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s it is having on the current society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, as for, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27249357326 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82805326863 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59383033419 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8239478032 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.733333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9333333333 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226780725876 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698881211524 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392309661607 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131959664353 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396685045328 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.