studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowaday many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person. In my opnion, I both agree and disagree about it.
First let me talk about the advantages about it. It is a fact that socialising online is very convenient especially during the covid-19, people have to work from home and they don't have chance to meet one another in person. So they have to socialising online to meet them because they don't have any choice. Beside I think socilsing online is a good way for people to see each other, to talk to their friends and family too. And another reasons why it is good is that they don't have to go outside and they can meet them whenever they want on the Internet. Socilising online is very convenient and easy to use everyone can use it and it can take your time.
On the other hand, I think socialising online is very harmful to your eyes because you have to look at the screen for a long time, and another reason is if you socialising online, your net work have to be very strong for you to connect to everyone and socialising online can't help you to meet one another in person, for some people like your family and your friends they want to meet you in person, they want to talk to you. So I think if you want to meet another in person socilising online is not a good way.
In short, I both disagree and agree about it but I think during the covid 19 pandemic you should prefer socilalising online to avoild something bad for you and your family.
- People who lige in large cities face a range of problems in their daily life What are the main problems people in cities face and how can these problems be tackled 73
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- These days many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers paricularyly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved Give reasons for you answer and include any revelant examples from your own knowle 73
- Some people think an international car free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution Others think there are more affective way do to this Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Discuss the advantages and disadvatages of working from home 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... people have to work from home and they dont have chance to meet one another in pers...
^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have to socialise'?
Suggestion: have to socialise
... to meet one another in person. So they have to socialising online to meet them because they dont h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lising online to meet them because they dont have any choice. Beside I think socilsi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...her reasons why it is good is that they dont have to go outside and they can meet th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nect to everyone and socialising online cant help you to meet one another in person,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, i think, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35611510791 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29629705766 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428057553957 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.052548177 49.4020404114 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 110.090909091 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325782719428 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14600979856 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157173941985 0.0667982634062 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232390722073 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117576338715 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 12.4159519038 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.58950901804 75% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 78.4519038076 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.