Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Modern technological advancement have made new opportunities for human being, which are nowadays playing a great impact on our life. It is found in a study that the young generation have a tendency to meet their friends online instead of meeting in person. This essay will discuss the possible reasons that are associated with this trend, and probable solutions to those problems.
To begin with new technology has a significant role in saving time in our life. Teenagers in modern time feel comfortable in seeing their friends virtually, and online classes is a major cause of this attitude. Besides, they think by this way they can save money from being spent unnecessarily. For example, one of my cousins told me that during the pandemic lockdown he only made connection with his friends online, and thus he could save about five thousand taka. Thereby, people have found online meeting a boon for them.
Although online connectivity can save time, it may week social bonding. It is, therefore, necessary to meet in person. Educational institutes should resume in person classes again. The youth can meet each other in an open park to save money instead of meeting in a restaurant. Thereby, they would be able to see their friends personally without spending a lot of money. For instance, I most of the time have fun with my friends in the city park with some peanuts. Therefore, we do not have to spend so much money. Moreover, we can enjoy the fresh air in the so traffic town.
Consequently, problems that are arising due to the modern technology have solutions.
To conclude, it can be said that, technology has a number of advantages for us. However, it can cause a number of problems also. Nevertheless, there are solutions to solve those complications.
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o meet in person. Educational institutes should resume in person classes again. T...
^^
Line 8, column 124, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ever, it can cause a number of problems also. Nevertheless, there are solutions to s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9364548495 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75104298253 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578595317726 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6389338061 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.95 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18853831132 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563618821515 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527706239135 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864118604047 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649896405413 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.