Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, there is an ever-increasing phenomenon that more students choose to learn online at home instead of taking part in offline classes. In my standpoint, offline classes benefit students more than the online one.
No one can deny that distance learning brings us comfort and convenience. However, learning at home could not provide students with regular face to face contact with teachers and classmates in the classroom. In traditional classes, students can declare their standpoint and clarify their queries directly with their teacher, thus they get the answers right away. Moreover, students could not access the facilities for some subjects such as Physical education, Chemistry and Craft. For example, if students studied at home, they could not learn to play volleyball and football for PE class as well as do Chemical experiments.
We may also point out the indisputable fact that interaction and rivalry with classmates in traditional classes are a great stimulus for scholastic success, which online classes could not provide students with. If there were some excellent students in the class, the others would have the motivation to make efforts in their study. Furthermore, school is the place for students to discover new relationships with their peers and teachers, which supports them with fully-equipped social skills. For instance, when students take part in sport clubs and group assignments, they learn how to cooperate with other people efficiently.
In conclusion, distance learning may have some pros, however, a traditional class is still more beneficial as it provides a more interactive and compatible education environment.
- qlkw5syt 11
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city
- Nowadays the development and popularity of state of art technology in mobile gadgets has changed the way people communicate and connect with each other This revolution engenders a public debate of whether the cons of these devices cancel out their drawbac 61
- More and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How can these problems be solved 78
- With the rapid advancement of communication technology smart phones tablets and other mobile devices some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50980392157 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90883129456 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0322682115 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307383582427 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115428749373 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682532538622 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185599946608 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543233999839 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.