To succeed in business, one needs to know maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Having a prospective business requires a range of skills and experience. While some argue that mathematical knowledge is needed for individuals to flourish in the business environment, I am more convinced that it is not essential to learn math to achieve business goals.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why maths plays an integral role in operating a business. Firstly, it may easily control their business' financial figures. To do this, she or he needs math statistics to make decisions about where and how capital should be allocated. As a result, some jobs like bankers, and accountants requires calculated skills, especially maths. Moreover, without maths, business owners do not have a solid understanding of basic arithmetic as well as algebra in order to run their business effectively.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the success of businesses does not entirely rely on math knowledge. The first one relates to the development of technology that helps people a lot in calculating larger data and illustrates profit and capital more speedy and quick. Therefore, companies can concentrate on other majors like design, and management, and cooperate with customers. In addition, success in a business requires a range of elements. For example, they must be passionate about work, ready for objecting to risks and accumulate a lot of practical experience. Furthermore, people only are good at some specialization so maths can be important to these people but that one is not. For instance, some people have the ability to write so they can run their own company specializing in writing articles and stories.
To summarize, I agree that a good grasp of math can contribute to entrepreneurs’ success. However, I am more convinced that businesses can also attain their goals without deep math understanding by asking for the support of technology tools and financial experts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 91
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 61
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is better to live in the countryside than in the city To what extent do you agree or disagree with this point 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to flourish in the business environment, I am more convinced that it is not essen...
^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires calculated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'calculating' or 'to be calculated'.
Suggestion: calculating; to be calculated
... like bankers, and accountants requires calculated skills, especially maths. Moreover, wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19480519481 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0489623417 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6898838384 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196061415462 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064183488472 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453401176794 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129179755135 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369157143494 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.